Skip to content
evidenceevidencetestimony2015 Federal TrialConrad's proffer that the defendant said "No one deserves such suffering," permitted as a basis for the proposed remorse opinion, with observations of his demeanor but no other factual statements by him. Conrad later said the words most likely used were "no one deserves to suffer like that."Conrad initially described a statement that nobody deserved such suffering, then said the likely wording was that nobody deserved to suffer that way. The court allowed the single statement and observations of the defendant's demeanor as a basis for Sister Prejean's proposed remorse opinion, but allowed no other factual statements by him.
← All Evidence
Testimony References

Conrad's proffer that the defendant said "No one deserves such suffering," permitted as a basis for the proposed remorse opinion, with observations of his demeanor but no other factual statements by him. Conrad later said the words most likely used were "no one deserves to suffer like that."

Conrad initially described a statement that nobody deserved such suffering, then said the likely wording was that nobody deserved to suffer that way. The court allowed the single statement and observations of the defendant's demeanor as a basis for Sister Prejean's proposed remorse opinion, but allowed no other factual statements by him.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

The court permitted the single proffered statement and observed demeanor as a basis for the proposed lay opinion of remorse, with no other factual statements by the defendant.

Trial Record (1)

2015 Federal Trial

Day 61