Facebook page the defense believed belonged to Juror 318's husband, containing posts opposing a mosque next to Ground Zero and supporting a Rolling Stone boycott

Conrad described a page the defense believed belonged to Juror 318's husband, with posts opposing a mosque near Ground Zero and supporting a Rolling Stone boycott. She presumed the boycott concerned the Tsarnaev cover; the government disputed an inference of juror bias, and the court requested access to the material before ruling.