← All EvidenceProceduralArgument on Silva's Gun-Request Testimony; Ruling Deferred
Testimony References
Government proffer of Mr. Silva's anticipated testimony about Mr. Tsarnaev's stated reason for requesting a gun and an alleged later report of a drug robbery
Prosecutors proffered that Tsarnaev told Silva he wanted a gun for a marijuana-related robbery and allegedly later reported using a gun in such a robbery. They stated a present intention not to elicit the later report but reserved their position depending on cross-examination. The court made no admissibility decision during the Day 32 exchange.
About
Prosecutors argued that the stated reason for requesting the gun explained the relationship and made Silva's account plausible, rather than showing criminal propensity; the defense challenged the account's corroboration and prejudicial effect.