Skip to content
evidenceevidencetestimony2015 Federal TrialGovernment's proposed rebuttal testimony on likely confinement conditions and the SAMs processOn Day 46, Weinreb proposed testimony grounded in realistically possible confinement conditions, including the prospect of placement outside the highest-security setting. He also proposed addressing judicial review and possible removal of SAMs, disputing the suggestion that government officials could maintain communication restrictions indefinitely at will.
← All Evidence
Testimony References

Government's proposed rebuttal testimony on likely confinement conditions and the SAMs process

On Day 46, Weinreb proposed testimony grounded in realistically possible confinement conditions, including the prospect of placement outside the highest-security setting. He also proposed addressing judicial review and possible removal of SAMs, disputing the suggestion that government officials could maintain communication restrictions indefinitely at will.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

The government sought the rebuttal as an alternative to excluding the defense's security evidence, arguing that jurors should receive a fuller account of realistically possible lifetime confinement rather than only its restrictions.

Trial Record (1)

2015 Federal Trial

Day 46