Skip to content
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev— Case Archive
evidenceevidencetestimony2015 Federal TrialGovernment's proposed testimony that a foreign national was injured at Scene AOn Day 42, Weinreb sought permission for a brief witness to testify that an injured person at Scene A was a foreign national, depending on the court's resolution of the defense's Rule 29 jurisdictional argument. The defense disputed the government's burden and waiver positions and objected to additional evidence; the legal questions remained unresolved.
← All Evidence
Testimony References

Government's proposed testimony that a foreign national was injured at Scene A

On Day 42, Weinreb sought permission for a brief witness to testify that an injured person at Scene A was a foreign national, depending on the court's resolution of the defense's Rule 29 jurisdictional argument. The defense disputed the government's burden and waiver positions and objected to additional evidence; the legal questions remained unresolved.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

The government conditionally proposed the testimony to disprove a disputed jurisdictional exemption for the public-use bombing counts if the court placed that burden on the prosecution.

Trial Record (1)