Skip to content
evidenceevidencedocument2015 Federal TrialJuror 393's questionnaireThe government cited Juror 393's questionnaire opposition to the death penalty and unanswered Question 90 in seeking exclusion, while the defense argued that the juror could vote for death if persuaded it was appropriate. The court expressed uncertainty about the reliability of both written and oral answers before excusing her.
← All Evidence
Documents & Records

Juror 393's questionnaire

The government cited Juror 393's questionnaire opposition to the death penalty and unanswered Question 90 in seeking exclusion, while the defense argued that the juror could vote for death if persuaded it was appropriate. The court expressed uncertainty about the reliability of both written and oral answers before excusing her.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

The court considered the questionnaire alongside oral answers and excused Juror 393 because it lacked a reliable basis to conclude that she could follow instructions.

Trial Record (1)

2015 Federal Trial

Day 16