Skip to content
evidenceevidencedocument2015 Federal TrialJuror 54's questionnaireJuror 54's questionnaire expressed opposition to capital punishment alongside a qualified willingness to impose it when the facts and law warranted it. During Day 6 argument, Bruck disputed Weinreb's description of the questionnaire as calling the death penalty state-sanctioned murder, identifying the wording instead as state-sponsored vengeance. Counsel disagreed about whether the juror's assurances overcame his reservations.
← All Evidence
Documents & Records

Juror 54's questionnaire

Juror 54's questionnaire expressed opposition to capital punishment alongside a qualified willingness to impose it when the facts and law warranted it. During Day 6 argument, Bruck disputed Weinreb's description of the questionnaire as calling the death penalty state-sanctioned murder, identifying the wording instead as state-sponsored vengeance. Counsel disagreed about whether the juror's assurances overcame his reservations.

2 proceedings2 mentions1 trial

Trial Record (2)