Skip to content
evidenceevidencedocument2015 Federal TrialJuror 645's written answers discussed by counselJuror 645's written answers described concern that jury service would burden the proper running of his meat-processing plant. Counsel also disputed whether his death-penalty answers showed genuine willingness to consider mitigation and both sentences.
← All Evidence
Documents & Records

Juror 645's written answers discussed by counsel

Juror 645's written answers described concern that jury service would burden the proper running of his meat-processing plant. Counsel also disputed whether his death-penalty answers showed genuine willingness to consider mitigation and both sentences.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

The defense cited the written answers in its cause challenge, arguing that business distraction and uncertain sentencing flexibility warranted excusal; the court rejected the hardship ground.

Trial Record (1)

2015 Federal Trial

Day 23