Skip to content
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev— Case Archive
evidenceevidencedigital2015 Federal TrialPhone extraction identified by Conrad as coming from Tamerlan's phoneConrad displayed a forensic extraction she identified as coming from Tamerlan's phone, contrasting its eight- and 18-second entries with network-record entries of 19 and 30 seconds. Fitzgerald agreed that the extraction listed 18 seconds for the April 15, 2013 call at 2:51, but could not explain how its software measured duration. He said the extraction was not used for his maps, although its contacts might have been used.
← All Evidence
Digital Evidence

Phone extraction identified by Conrad as coming from Tamerlan's phone

Conrad displayed a forensic extraction she identified as coming from Tamerlan's phone, contrasting its eight- and 18-second entries with network-record entries of 19 and 30 seconds. Fitzgerald agreed that the extraction listed 18 seconds for the April 15, 2013 call at 2:51, but could not explain how its software measured duration. He said the extraction was not used for his maps, although its contacts might have been used.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

Conrad used the extraction to test whether network-record durations established actual conversation length, but Fitzgerald did not determine whether the different timings were inconsistent or what interval the extraction measured.

Trial Record (1)