Skip to content
evidenceevidencetestimony2015 Federal TrialPrior testimony concerning prison programming in the defendant's cell, disputed as suggesting televisionDuring the Day 62 discussion of closing-argument limits, Bruck argued that the question about watching prison programming circumvented the court's restriction on television evidence. The judge considered the wording a deliberate and inappropriate suggestion of television and urged both sides to stay within existing limits.
← All Evidence
Testimony References

Prior testimony concerning prison programming in the defendant's cell, disputed as suggesting television

During the Day 62 discussion of closing-argument limits, Bruck argued that the question about watching prison programming circumvented the court's restriction on television evidence. The judge considered the wording a deliberate and inappropriate suggestion of television and urged both sides to stay within existing limits.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

Trial Record (1)

2015 Federal Trial

Day 62