Skip to content
evidenceevidencedocument2015 Federal TrialProffer of Sister Helen Prejean's proposed testimony, reviewed paragraph by paragraph; Conrad emphasized that it was not a verbatim script.The court and counsel reviewed Sister Helen Prejean's proposed testimony paragraph by paragraph, and Conrad emphasized that the proffer was not a verbatim script. The court permitted an observation-based remorse opinion, limited spiritual-counseling background including prisoners, and disclosure of death-penalty opposition, but barred support based on death-row experience or explanations of that opposition through moral or experiential reasons. The court also excluded wording presuming an ongoing remorse process, predictions of lifelong painful remembrance or growth, and proposed future visits or willingness to work with the defendant.
← All Evidence
Documents & Records

Proffer of Sister Helen Prejean's proposed testimony, reviewed paragraph by paragraph; Conrad emphasized that it was not a verbatim script.

The court and counsel reviewed Sister Helen Prejean's proposed testimony paragraph by paragraph, and Conrad emphasized that the proffer was not a verbatim script. The court permitted an observation-based remorse opinion, limited spiritual-counseling background including prisoners, and disclosure of death-penalty opposition, but barred support based on death-row experience or explanations of that opposition through moral or experiential reasons. The court also excluded wording presuming an ongoing remorse process, predictions of lifelong painful remembrance or growth, and proposed future visits or willingness to work with the defendant.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

Review of the proffer defined the permitted scope of Prejean's remorse testimony and excluded argumentative descriptions and predictions of future remorse or development.

Trial Record (1)

2015 Federal Trial

Day 61