← All EvidenceClosingClosing Argument - Aloke Chakravarty Aloke Chakravarty
Physical Evidence
Two smashed phones
In closing argument, Chakravarty distinguished a phone allegedly used to communicate with the defendant's brother from the defendant's everyday phone. He argued that the defendant smashed both before entering the boat to prevent tracking and recovery of useful data.
About
Chakravarty argued that smashing the phones showed the defendant's presence of mind and intent to obstruct tracking and data recovery; that purpose was counsel's inference.