Skip to content
evidenceevidencephysical2015 Federal TrialTwo smashed phonesIn closing argument, Chakravarty distinguished a phone allegedly used to communicate with the defendant's brother from the defendant's everyday phone. He argued that the defendant smashed both before entering the boat to prevent tracking and recovery of useful data.
← All Evidence
Physical Evidence

Two smashed phones

In closing argument, Chakravarty distinguished a phone allegedly used to communicate with the defendant's brother from the defendant's everyday phone. He argued that the defendant smashed both before entering the boat to prevent tracking and recovery of useful data.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

Chakravarty argued that smashing the phones showed the defendant's presence of mind and intent to obstruct tracking and data recovery; that purpose was counsel's inference.

Trial Record (1)