Vakhabov FBI 302 reviewed for redaction

The Court reviewed Vakhabov's FBI 302 for redaction, distinguishing historical facts from opinions especially requiring cross-examination. It excluded double-hearsay and disputed opinion passages, including radicalism and childlike characterizations, and rejected replacement wording. The Court described its acceptance as conditional and said it would give an immediate and later caution concerning the unavailable witness, referring to Vakhabov's refusal to testify.