Skip to content
personpersonChristian FierabendChristian FierabendFBI special agent assigned to the Boston violent crimes squad.← All People
Law enforcementFBI

Christian Fierabend

FBI special agent assigned to the Boston violent crimes squad.

219 lines·4 proceedings·1 mention

About

Christian Fierabend testified for the prosecution on Day 39 as an FBI special agent who participated in the Marathon bombing investigation. He compared pressure-cooker and BB purchase records with portable GPS data, while explaining that those comparisons did not identify the vehicles, occupants, or purchasers.

On direct examination, Fierabend described a January 31 purchase of six-quart and four-quart pressure cookers shortly before a recorded stop near Square One Mall ended. March 6 Walmart BB receipts also corresponded to New Hampshire stops. Relevant purchase surveillance was unavailable, and he could not connect a separate March 17 cooker sale to the Boylston Street bombing. He also described radio-controlled equipment records associated with Tamerlan Tsarnaev and a wallet receipt for Ful and JanSport backpacks. Although those brands were recovered at the Marathon Sports explosion site and Laurel Street, he did not identify the recovered items as the particular backpacks purchased.

Under cross-examination by Timothy Watkins, Fierabend confirmed that Target surveillance showed one person selecting and purchasing two backpacks. He described the shopper as closely resembling Tamerlan and said he believed the close-up showed Tamerlan. He did not know exactly how agents verified the receipt, but agreed that the displayed transaction log matched its items, payment amount, and SKU numbers. Questions about vehicle searches also elicited qualified recollections about gloves and trace filters; no laboratory findings were discussed.

On redirect, Fierabend confirmed that the Honda Odyssey was registered to Anzor Tsarnaev and the Honda CR-V to Tamerlan. He believed the wallet had been found in a Honda Civic but did not know who owned that vehicle. He acknowledged that the examined evidence did not establish who drove the vehicles, placed items inside them, or used them at particular times.

Trial Record (4)

2015 Trial2015 Federal TrialJan 5, 2015 โ€“ Jun 24, 2015Called by prosecution

Christian Fierabend testified for the prosecution about pressure-cooker, BB, and backpack purchase evidence, including comparisons with GPS stops. His testimony distinguished those correlations from proof of who made the purchases or used the vehicles, and cross-examination elicited a qualified identification of Tamerlan as the backpack shopper.

Day 39

DirectChristian Fierabend โ€” DirectChristian FierabendWilliam D. Weinreb3highlightsMentioned166lines spoken

Summary

Fierabend compared pressure-cooker and BB purchases with GPS stops but could not identify the purchasers. He also described records associated with Tamerlan, backpack receipts, and contested exhibit and holster questions.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (3)

testimony highlightMacy's records showed a six-quart and a four-quart pressure-cooker purchase at Square One on January 31 at 8:38 p.m., shortly before the GPS resumed movement. Fierabend could not identify the vehicle, occupants, or purchaser, and no surveillance video was available.Open in transcript →
testimony highlightFierabend compared two March 6 BB receipts with GPS stops, correcting counsel's suggested Hudson location to Amherst for the second purchase. He said the records did not identify the vehicle, occupants, or purchasers.Open in transcript →
testimony highlightA wallet receipt showed an April 14 purchase of one Ful and one JanSport backpack. Fierabend confirmed that Ful remains were recovered at the Marathon Sports explosion site and a JanSport backpack at the Laurel Street crime scene.Open in transcript →
RedirectChristian Fierabend โ€” RedirectChristian FierabendWilliam D. Weinreb1highlight7lines spoken

Summary

Fierabend clarified vehicle registrations and acknowledged that the examined evidence did not identify vehicle users or who placed items inside.

Highlights (1)

admissionFierabend acknowledged that the exhibits and data examined in court did not identify who drove the vehicles, placed items inside them, used them more frequently, or used them at particular dates and times.Open in transcript →