Skip to content
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev— Case Archive
evidenceevidencedocument2015 Federal TrialDefense motion to modify the pretrial SAMsBruck said the defense's pretrial SAMs challenges concerned access and preparation, were never ruled on, and resulted in voluntary government modifications. Weinreb argued that the motion's reliance on constitutional and legal review made it fair to discuss during cross-examination about confinement restrictions.
← All Evidence
Documents & Records

Defense motion to modify the pretrial SAMs

Bruck said the defense's pretrial SAMs challenges concerned access and preparation, were never ruled on, and resulted in voluntary government modifications. Weinreb argued that the motion's reliance on constitutional and legal review made it fair to discuss during cross-examination about confinement restrictions.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

The parties disputed whether the pretrial SAMs motion fairly illustrated the possibility of changing future confinement restrictions: Bruck distinguished defense-access concerns from sentencing conditions, while Weinreb invoked the motion as an example of legal review and modification.

Trial Record (1)

2015 Federal Trial

Day 60