Skip to content
personpersonMichelle GambleMichelle GambleFBI field photographer for the Boston Division, trained in photography, audio and video.← All People
WitnessFBI

Michelle Gamble

FBI field photographer for the Boston Division, trained in photography, audio and video.

379 lines·14 proceedings·5 mentions

About

Michelle Gamble testified as an FBI field photographer, using investigation photographs, surveillance footage, receipts, and phone records to describe the second bombing site and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's movements. On Day 41, she identified his backpack, blast damage, and the locations of Lingzi Lu's and Martin Richard's bodies. She compared a SIM-card receipt naming Jahar Tsarni with an earlier backpack-purchase receipt and compared surveillance timing with phone records. Her proposed 20-second adjustment to the Forum video's timestamps depended on the race clock being accurate; the court allowed arithmetic using counsel's supplied starting time after sustaining foundation objections.

During cross-examination, Miriam Conrad tested the limits of those comparisons and Gamble's location diagram. Gamble acknowledged that the diagram depicted a minute before the second explosion and omitted nearby people, including Bill Richard, at the government's direction. She agreed that phone-record duration began with dialing and did not establish conversation length. Photograph metadata corrected her initial belief about one image's time to 2:49 p.m. She confirmed backpack placement around 2:45 p.m. and Tsarnaev's subsequent movement away, but rejected the suggestion that he was no longer visible immediately before the second blast.

On redirect, Gamble said the children remained in substantially the same positions until the first explosion, when people moved, and that Tsarnaev was almost off screen at the second explosion. The court sustained objections to questions seeking inferences about preparing to detonate a bomb and looking back; Gamble gave no answers to those questions. On recross, she agreed that Tsarnaev began walking away immediately after the first blast and added that some girls did too. An earlier photograph taken around 2:37 p.m. was admitted.

The defense then recalled Gamble about searches. She confirmed that she photographed the May 5, 2013 search of 410 Norfolk Street and, using a sketch, identified the wiring book's recovery location beneath the living-room couch. The court admitted the packaged book and its photograph, but excluded a proposed recovery-list extract and found inadequate foundation to refresh her recollection about a July property search. Gamble did not remember the book or know whether vacuum samples reached the laboratory. On prosecution cross-examination, she clarified that she was a field photographer, not an FBI agent, and authenticated a room photograph that the court admitted.

On Day 51, during the penalty phase, Gamble explained a full-size photographic grate reproduction made by measuring recovered sections and duplicating one section. Over defense objections, the court admitted it and allowed a demonstration. Her estimate of about three and a half feet measured the blast site's distance from Martin Richard's position in a photograph, not his independently established position at the explosion. She also explained synchronizing Atlantic Fish Company audio with silent Forum surveillance footage. The combined recording was admitted and played, along with admission of three Richard family photographs and highlighted surveillance footage. The defense asked no cross-examination questions.

Trial Record (14)

2015 Trial2015 Federal TrialJan 5, 2015 – Jun 24, 2015Called by prosecution and defense

Michelle Gamble used photographs, surveillance footage, and phone records to describe Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's backpack placement and movements near the second bombing site. Cross-examination established that her location diagram omitted nearby people and that recorded call durations did not establish conversation lengths.

Day 41

DirectDirect Examination - Michelle GambleMichelle GambleWilliam D. Weinreb1highlight132lines spoken

Summary

Michelle Gamble compared purchase receipts, surveillance timing, and phone records, then used photographs and a chalk to identify the backpack, second blast site, and victim locations.

Highlights (1)

testimony highlightGamble compared Forum video timestamps with the calculated race-clock time, treating the video as 20 seconds slow if the race clock was accurate. She calculated a 19-second interval for the figure's hand-to-face movements and compared it with phone records. She testified that the recorded outgoing call preceded the first explosion and an incoming call followed the second by approximately a minute and 20 seconds.Open in transcript →
CrossCross-Examination - Michelle GambleMichelle GambleMiriam Conrad2highlights90lines spoken

Summary

Conrad tested Gamble's location chalk, call-duration interpretation, and surveillance timing; three defense exhibits were admitted, while proposed search evidence remained outside the scope of cross-examination.

Highlights (2)

testimony highlightAfter the court overruled a foundation objection, Gamble agreed that photograph 3146's metadata showed 2:49 p.m., rather than the 2:48 time she had initially believed.Open in transcript →
admissionUsing photograph 3146, Conrad established that the chalk omitted four people in front of Mr. Tsarnaev and people to the right of Martin Richard; Gamble attributed those omissions to the prosecution's instructions.Open in transcript →
DirectDirect Examination - Michelle Gamble (Defense Recall)Michelle GambleMiriam Conrad1highlightMentioned43lines spoken

Summary

The defense recalled Gamble to introduce wiring-book evidence and question search records; memory and foundation limits constrained testimony about recovery details and the July search.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

Quote“I don't remember this book.”— Michelle GambleGamble expressly distinguished reading the recovery record from remembering the recovered item.Open in transcript →
CrossCross-Examination - Michelle Gamble (Defense Recall)Michelle GambleAloke Chakravarty1highlightMentioned12lines spoken

Summary

Gamble clarified her photographer role and authenticated a room photograph. The court admitted it but limited further questioning, including the defense's proposed use of a prior government statement.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

Quote“No, I am not. I'm a field photographer.”— Michelle GambleGamble corrected the description of her as an FBI agent, clarifying her role in the searches.Open in transcript →

Day 49

Day 51

DirectDirect Examination - Michelle GambleMichelle GambleWilliam D. Weinreb3highlights71lines spoken

Summary

Michelle Gamble measured Martin Richard's pictured distance from the blast site over defense objections and authenticated an audio-video overlay, family photographs, and highlighted surveillance footage.

Highlights (3)

testimony highlightOver renewed objections, Gamble measured about three and a half feet between the explosion site and Martin Richard's position in the photograph—not an independently established position at the moment of the blast.Open in transcript →
evidence eventGamble explained how she aligned separately recorded audio with the Forum surveillance video. Exhibit 1634C was admitted and played.Open in transcript →
Quote“I stripped the audio out of the Atlantic Fish Company video and I brought that into the timeline for the Forum video and matched the explosion up right when the bomb goes off.”— Michelle GambleGamble explained that the admitted audio-video exhibit combined two recordings aligned at the explosion.Open in transcript →