Skip to content
personpersonJames McAlearJames McAlearJury administrator who coordinated prospective juror attendance.← All People
Mentioned

James McAlear

Jury administrator who coordinated prospective juror attendance.

117 lines·19 proceedings·3 mentions

About

James McAlear supported jury selection as the jury administrator, coordinating prospective-juror scheduling and receiving counsel's agreed strikes. On Day 4, he was present when the court discussed scheduling conflicts caused by moving prospective jurors' appearances to the following morning. Counsel asked how late they could communicate agreed strikes to avoid unnecessary juror trips.

On Day 17, the parties reported giving McAlear a list of agreed strikes for Panel C. He also raised late-morning parking difficulties during discussion of a later start after an appellate argument; the discussion provided for jurors to arrive earlier.

On Day 18, counsel reported that McAlear had supplied lists of the next 20 candidates and another 10 for review. Counsel planned to review them over the weekend and said McAlear could fill openings if he received their results by Monday. This planning accompanied the court's proposal for a pool of 25 prospective jurors on Tuesday.

Trial Record (19)

2015 Trial2015 Federal TrialJan 5, 2015 – Jun 24, 2015

James McAlear coordinated prospective-juror scheduling and candidate lists as jury administrator during jury selection. Counsel communicated agreed strikes through him and planned further screening so he could fill openings in an upcoming juror pool.

Day 4

Day 5

Day 8

Day 9

Day 10

Day 11

Voir DireIndividual Voir Dire Resumed3lines spoken

Summary

Two prospective jurors faced questions about hardship, publicity, and sentencing views. The court limited several defense follow-ups concerning a child's death, venue opinions, death-penalty ratings, and law-enforcement credibility.

Day 12

Day 14

Day 17

Day 18

sidebarJuror Challenges and Peremptory Strike Procedures1highlightMentioned2lines spoken

Summary

Counsel debated Juror 448’s emotional response, death penalty views, and ability to consider mitigation, along with hardship screening and competing procedures for peremptory strikes.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

procedural actionCounsel arranged weekend review of additional prospective jurors, with results to reach Mr. McAlear by Monday so he could backfill the pool.Open in transcript →

Day 19

Day 23

Day 25