Skip to content
2015 Federal Trialtrial-daytrial-dayAloke ChakravartySteven D. MellinNadine PellegriniWilliam D. WeinrebDavid I. BruckTimothy G. WatkinsMichael CashmanAnthony GrassiMichael NickersonWilliam J. O'Keefe, Jr.Eddie LakkisAlan MednickDun MengRené RobinsonJoseph W. SullivandirectcrossredirectDay 32 - March 12, 2015Witnesses described Collier's shooting scene and autopsy, while Dun Meng recounted the armed carjacking and his escape. Surveillance, bank records, and police tracking testimony followed. Counsel also addressed proposed gun-request testimony, the temporal limits of glove DNA evidence, and the source of Whole Foods footage.
← Day 312015 Federal TrialDay 33 →

Day 32 - March 12, 2015

Collier Evidence, Meng's Carjacking Account, and Evidentiary Disputes

Judge George A. O'Toole Jr.
23Proceedings
12Pages
9Witnesses
2,694Lines
1Sidebars
Day 32 of 67
Appearing:

Witnesses described Collier's shooting scene and autopsy, while Dun Meng recounted the armed carjacking and his escape. Surveillance, bank records, and police tracking testimony followed. Counsel also addressed proposed gun-request testimony, the temporal limits of glove DNA evidence, and the source of Whole Foods footage.

Full day summary

Prosecution witnesses described Sean Collier's shooting scene, autopsy findings, and surveillance evidence. Trooper Michael Cashman compared surveillance images with footage of the recovered Honda driven through the same camera view. He said the vehicle appeared to be the Honda abandoned on Laurel Street and clarified that the comparison used the same lighting, not the same clock time. Detective Anthony Grassi described shell casings and other evidence around and inside Collier's cruiser. He corrected an initial report that Collier's gun was missing, saying another officer later told him it was secured in an MIT cruiser. Forensic pathologist René Robinson identified head gunshot wounds as Collier's cause of death and homicide as the manner. She described three head wounds and right-hand injuries but could not determine the shot order or an exact intermediate-range firing distance without weapon testing. A hand position on the console was possible, not established. On cross-examination, she discussed possible residue dispersal and deferred questions about backward blood spatter to a specialist. Jurors saw autopsy photographs that were withheld from public screens and the overflow courtroom. Dun Meng testified that Tamerlan Tsarnaev entered his SUV at gunpoint, robbed him, and claimed responsibility for the Marathon explosion and killing a Cambridge policeman. Meng identified the defendant as the second man and described his ATM and gas-station activity. Meng did not look back during the transfer of unidentified items into the SUV. After an objection, he clarified that Tamerlan alone had said both men had guns; on cross-examination, he confirmed that Tamerlan's gun was the only one he saw. Meng described escaping from the Shell station to the Mobil station across the street, requesting a 911 call, and hiding in a storage room. Station witnesses authenticated surveillance footage, and a composite of gas-station video and 911 audio was admitted and played during Meng's testimony. Bank security witness William O'Keefe described a rejected PIN entry, a successful $800 withdrawal, and another $800 request rejected for exceeding the withdrawal limit. Officer Michael Nickerson and dispatcher Joseph Sullivan described the police response and vehicle tracking. The court limited testimony about reported statements to explaining events rather than establishing their truth. Sullivan recalled an initial reported location on Dexter Avenue in Watertown and updated readings, but could not specify tracking precision. Counsel also disputed anticipated testimony that Tsarnaev requested a gun for a drug robbery. The court framed the issue principally under Rules 402 and 403 without deciding admissibility. Prosecutors presently intended not to offer an alleged later report of a completed robbery but declined an advance commitment. The court clarified that the glove DNA temporal-linkage limitation applied to both brothers; the government then said it would not call Mark Perlin. Separately, the defense questioned whether Whole Foods footage derived from hospital statements. Prosecutors attributed its discovery to a civilian tip. The court cautioned against reliance on those statements, but no suppression ruling or disclosure order followed.

3. René Robinson — Direct/Cross/Redirect

René Robinson described Sean Collier’s fatal head wounds and nonfatal hand injuries, while explaining limits on determining shot order and firing distance. Cross-examination addressed residue and blood spatter; redirect confirmed that stippling was on Collier’s face.

→
Direct
René Robinson — Direct René Robinson Steven D. Mellin
435 lines

Robinson described Collier's fatal head wounds, including two contact shots, and explained limits on determining shot order, exact distance, and hand position.

Cross
René Robinson — Cross René Robinson Timothy G. Watkins
34 lines

Robinson discussed possible residue deposits and blood-spatter dispersal, while qualifying her answers and identifying a limit on her expertise.

Redirect
René Robinson — Redirect René Robinson Steven D. Mellin
7 lines

Robinson confirmed that the stippling was on Officer Collier's face.

Highlights

4. Alan Mednick — Direct

Memorial Shell owner Alan Mednick testified about the station’s surveillance footage and its collection by investigators. The court admitted related exhibits without objection, and the defense declined cross-examination.

→
Direct
Alan Mednick — Direct Alan Mednick William D. Weinreb
192 lines

Mednick authenticated Shell station surveillance and photographs, described recorded movement toward the store and across River Street, and explained how he supplied footage to investigators.

sidebar
Scheduling the Watertown Evidence
4 lines

Weinreb described apparent agreement to begin the Watertown evidence Monday if the carjacking and kidnapping presentation continued through lunch, noting uncertainty about whether the defense had seen upcoming exhibits.

6. Dun Meng — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Dun Meng described the carjacking and his escape, authenticated gas station footage and a 911 recording, and answered cross-examination and redirect questions about the defendant’s actions and the only gun Meng saw.

→
Direct
Dun Meng — Direct Dun Meng Steven D. Mellin
645 lines

Meng described the armed carjacking, identified the defendant, distinguished the men's actions, and recounted escaping to a Mobil station to seek a 911 call.

Direct
Dun Meng — Direct (continued) Dun Meng Steven D. Mellin
183 lines

Meng explained escape footage and his 911 report, described vehicle-tracking information, and identified his Mercedes through admitted photographs and a matching VIN.

Cross
Dun Meng — Cross Dun Meng David I. Bruck
47 lines

Meng confirmed Tamerlan's armed actions, said he saw no other gun, and recalled Jahar first asking about playing music.

Redirect
Dun Meng — Redirect Dun Meng Steven D. Mellin
26 lines

Meng identified Jahar's actions involving the car, ATM, and gas stops, while qualifying his account of the loading. Two defense objections were overruled.

Highlights

← Day 312015 Federal TrialDay 33 →