3.Mark Spencer — Cross/Redirect/Recross (Part 2)
408 linesCROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. CHAKRAVARTY:
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Good morning, Mr. Spencer.
MARK SPENCER: Good morning.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: We've met before?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: That other case that you testified in, I had the privilege of cross-examining you in that case, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: That was another case where you testified for the defense, right?
MARK SPENCER: That's correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Now, you said that you had spent about 400 hours so far on this case?
MARK SPENCER: That's correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Is that how much you've billed for or how much your firm has spent on the case?
MARK SPENCER: That's how much we've billed for in this case.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: You still have another bill, I hope, to submit?
MARK SPENCER: That's correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: About how much do you expect to be billing for it?
THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer.
MARK SPENCER: I do not know, but I believe it will be higher than the monthly bills prior because of the amount of time that we spent this month.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And that's getting ready for trial. And you digging into each of these materials that Mr. Fick asked you about takes a lot of time, right?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And that's both your time as well as the other people in your firm?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Do you think it's going to be more than 400 hours additional?
THE COURT: Overruled.
MARK SPENCER: No.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So just in terms of the limitations of your science, you can't tell who is actually using a computer at any given time; is that fair to say?
MARK SPENCER: I think, generally speaking, that's fair to say.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Unless you have a video camera or some other way to have some extrinsic evidence saying that Mark Spencer is using a computer, then you just have to infer it from the activity on the computer, right?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And one of the ways that you do that is you check to see if the person is logging into his email account, for example?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Or his Twitter account, that kind of thing, right?
MARK SPENCER: (Nodding.)
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Having looked at the computers, you recognize that the Sony VAIO computer, the 1R6, was the defendant's computer, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's, right?
MARK SPENCER: Correct, yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So the fact that the user account name was called Anzor was simply what the user of the computer decided to name his computer, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Correct. That's arbitrary, yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: In fact, the full name on the Windows information was that it was -- Jahar was the full name of the user?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Through similar analysis, you gleaned that the Samsung computer that was found in Watertown, what was called the 1W3 today, that was Tamerlan's computer, correct?
MARK SPENCER: That would be a portion of the analysis, yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And some of the other devices, it's less clear, right?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Because those are not complete computer operating systems in which one person was the exclusive user. There were actually -- if it was a removable media, it was put into many different devices?
MARK SPENCER: Correct, right. Many of them are meant to be mobile devices.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And I think some of the exhibits you pointed to today actually showed that there were migrating files between devices, right?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And, in addition, there was a desktop computer found at the 410 Norfolk Street residence in the defendant's room that was used by a lot of different people, right?
THE COURT: Go ahead. You may answer it.
MARK SPENCER: Multiple users, yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: There were some children's shows on that as well as some jihad-related materials as well as innocuous materials, correct?
THE COURT: Overruled.
MARK SPENCER: I would agree that there was all kinds of material on that computer, yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Now, both the defendant's computer and his brother's computer had searches for the Boston Marathon explosions after the Boston Marathon, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And both of them had the Inspire magazines, some of the collection which you pointed out today as well as some additional issues, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Both of them had other radical Islamist extremist material as well, correct?
THE COURT: Overruled.
MARK SPENCER: Material that I understand to be jihadi-related, yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: You pointed out that there was a search on Tamerlan's computer in March of 2013 for a Ruger P95; do you remember that?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And that was -- from the internet history, you saw that somebody plugged into Google or something "Ruger P95," right?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And so do you also know that that is after the defendant had already obtained the P95?
THE COURT: Sustained.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Were there searches for other guns on Tamerlan's computer?
MARK SPENCER: I do not recall. If you show me the internet history, I can look through it.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And the -- you also were shown a search on Tamerlan's computer on April 7, 2013 -- this is about a week before the Marathon -- for "fireworks" and "detonation" -- or "detonator," is that right?
MARK SPENCER: Sounds correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So that was only a week before the Marathon is when the "detonator" and "fireworks" were sought, according to your analysis?
MARK SPENCER: That search term, correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And do you know that the defendant had actually returned to Cambridge the week before the Marathon?
THE COURT: Sustained.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Now, on the Sony VAIO computer, the defendant's computer, there were also some additional searches of interest; is that fair to say? You looked at some of the searches on the Sony VAIO computer?
MARK SPENCER: Yes, yeah, many searches.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Mr. Bruemmer.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Your Honor, the witness was asked if he had searched -- had found evidence --
THE COURT: Go ahead.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: -- on all the things he looked at.
THE COURT: Go ahead.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Now, Mr. Spencer, is it true that the defendant made some searches just before the Boston Marathon, on April 11, 2013, for the -- under the search term "the call of jihad"? Do you remember that?
MARK SPENCER: I see that, yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And this is a -- I'm pulling up 3303-02, which is a parsed web search from the Sony VAIO computer that you had created, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Your Honor, if I could ask to publish just that search entry, just this page?
THE COURT: All right. The whole page or the file?
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: I think just the file area. I'll zoom in as much as I can.
MR. FICK: Again, note the objection on scope. Frankly, if we're going -- I'd rather the whole page be in if we're going to be -- to show --
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: I don't have objection to that.
THE COURT: All right. Okay. Are you set with it now so I can --
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Yes, please, your Honor.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So this entry shows that the user of this device, the weekend before the Boston Marathon bombing, searches for "the call of jihad," correct?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Your Honor, just for the witness again, please.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Again, sometime before the Marathon, back in February of 2013, the user of this device also searched for "Jannah al Firdaus," is that accurate?
MARK SPENCER: February 2, 2013?
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: February 2.
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Again, your Honor, I would ask to publish Page 29 of this exhibit.
THE COURT: All right.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: That's this entry here that I'm just circling.
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And do you know what "Jannah al Firdaus" means?
MARK SPENCER: I've seen the phrase. I don't recall.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Again, just for the witness, your Honor.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: This is some of the internet search history for -- that include references to the Boston Marathon explosions at the finish line, is that accurate?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And there are a few different pages related to the searches of the Boston Marathon, correct?
MARK SPENCER: There's multiple entries related to searches of that type, yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And there are multiple entries related to searches related to jihad as well, correct? We saw one of them. I'm just asking are there others in addition to the "call of jihad" search.
MARK SPENCER: I believe so.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Now, if we could turn to the 1W16, this was the hard drive that was found on the street in Watertown. You had examined that hard drive and recognized that there were a number of files that were in what we call the unallocated space of that hard drive; is that fair to say?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And so that means that there were -- I think there were mostly MP3-type audio files, maybe somebody's song collection?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And amongst the maybe thousands of songs that had been on that hard drive, there were also some files related to some homework or school work of somebody named Giovanni, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And all of that stuff was deleted, and it was replaced with some of the files that Mr. Fick asked you about today, right?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So the Inspire magazines, the Awlaki lectures, all that stuff replaced this hard drive that had a lot of MP3 songs on it and some homework assignments, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And so the homework assignments, did you recognize were in 2012 for a UMass Dartmouth student?
THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer it.
MARK SPENCER: I don't think I took note of the content.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: In any event, those were still -- you could still see traces of those files on the computer. That's how you know it was all on there?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And after the -- those files were placed on that hard drive, that hard drive was then plugged into the defendant's Sony laptop, right?
MARK SPENCER: That's correct.
THE COURT: Maybe you could make that clear.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So you said that the external hard drive was plugged into Tamerlan's computer, I think, back in January of 2013, correct?
MARK SPENCER: If you could show me a list of attachment dates.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Sure. Let me go to some of your exhibits. You recognize this? This is 3302-04.
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And this is a list of various removable storage devices that were plugged -- that the external hard drive that we're talking about was plugged into various devices, right?
MARK SPENCER: Computers that it was plugged into, yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Sorry, plugged into various computers. In fact, there's two computers it was plugged into, according to this chart: Tamerlan's computer and the defendant's computer, right?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: According to this chart, on January 21, 2013, there was a file called setupapi.dev.log. That's a file that simply tells you that this device is plugged into a computer, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Basically, yeah. You can determine the first attachment time.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So this is the first time that this device was plugged into the -- Tamerlan's computer?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So on January 21, 2013, it was first plugged in. By the way, for the benefit of the jury, is this chart helpful to explain what this -- the removable storage attachment sequence was?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Your Honor, I would move in evidence 3302-04.
THE COURT: Okay.
(Exhibit No. 3302-04 received into evidence.)
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And ask to publish.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So this shows that on January 21, 2013, this device, which is the laptop -- excuse me, the external hard drive, was plugged into Tamerlan's computer, the Samsung 1W3, right?
MARK SPENCER: Right.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And then this chart shows that in March, again, of 2013, about a month before the Marathon, it was plugged in for the first time, it looks like, into the Sony 1R6, which is the defendant's computer, right?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And then a few minutes later, it goes back into Tamerlan's computer, right?
MARK SPENCER: Right.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And then later, the next morning, it goes back into the defendant's computer, right?
MARK SPENCER: Right.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And then it gets plugged in two more times, both times into the defendant's computer, right?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: In fact, the last time it goes in is about a week and a half before the Marathon, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And, in fact, the defendant's computer, the Sony 1R6, actually accessed this Samsung -- excuse me, the 1W16, the external hard drive, on March 18th. It watched some videos. It did some other activity on that day, correct?
MARK SPENCER: That sounds correct. In terms of exactly what it accessed, I'd need to see the -- the shortcut or jump list activity.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Okay. So let's go to --
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Thank you, your Honor.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: -- 3300. Now, I've just put up for you what you've labeled as the live MFT record, Laurel 1W16. And that is the master file table drawn from Windows for that device, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And so this is a six-page document?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Again, is this an extraction that you had from the external hard drive that was found on Laurel Street?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: I would move into evidence 3300-07, your Honor.
THE COURT: All right.
(Exhibit No. 3300-07 received into evidence.)
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So this shows some of the files that were on that device, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Yes. This should be a complete listing of all the files and folders on that -- currently on that device.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And so we were just talking about the March 18, 2013, day that this device was plugged into the Sony VAIO; do you remember that?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And so this first column, is this the first -- this is the name of the file, and then this is the creation date, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So this entry -- let's use, for example, Entry 67 -- shows that that file was created on this device on March 18, 2013, right?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And it was accessed on April 6, 2013, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And, again, we just looked at the earlier exhibit, which showed that that access, April 18th and April 6th, were both on the Sony VAIO, correct?
THE COURT: The chart is --
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: The chart speaks for itself.
THE COURT: -- is plain, I think.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: This also shows that some of those files that you had talked about before, the Inspire magazines, over in this section, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And, specifically, it shows -- I'll zoom in here -- the Complete Inspire magazine that Mr. Fick asked you about, that you heard a lot about when Agent Swindon testified, that's this entry, Exhibit 38, right?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Now, you said that this device was first plugged into Tamerlan's computer on January 21, 2013, is that right?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And so there's a creation date of December 27, 2012, on this file list, right?
MARK SPENCER: Right.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And that means that on this computer this file existed on December 27, 2012, is that accurate?
MARK SPENCER: No, that is not accurate.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So then why is this date, which predates the date that the computer was plugged in -- the device was plugged into Tamerlan's computer, how else can you explain this December 27, 2012?
MARK SPENCER: Files and folders that are moved to a location as opposed to having been copied or originally created in that location, will retain the created date and time of the former location.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So you're suggesting then that that's the date that it existed on Tamerlan's computer or however the file got to this hard drive, right? That date preexisted the existence -- creation date on this hard drive?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So that's inconsistent with what you described as the creation date, right?
MARK SPENCER: The creation date of?
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: The creation date you said that was on this hard drive. You described the creation date as -- you told Mr. Fick that it was the date that the file was either created in a specific location or it was moved to a specific location, right?
MARK SPENCER: If the file or folder is moved to a location as opposed to copied or originally created there, the date and time is from its previous location, not its current location.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Okay. So for all of these other files, January 25, 2013, all of the other Inspire magazines were January 25, 2013, right?
MARK SPENCER: January 25, 2013?
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Yup. And all of these other files on the next page, including the Awlaki lectures, were sometime in March of 2013, right?
MARK SPENCER: Right.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: In fact, there's no other entry for 2012 except for that one entry, right? That's the only entry that shows a creation date of 2012, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Right.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And so you analyzed all of the devices in this case, but you only presented some charts from -- for some of those devices, correct?
THE COURT: Sustained.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: If this hard drive actually were not plugged into Tamerlan's computer but was plugged into the Norfolk desktop that also accessed Complete Inspire around that same time, then you would expect to see a setup API log file on the desktop, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Correct. We would expect to see this device in that log.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Right. And you didn't put that into your chart, did you?
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: It's the lack of completeness of the chart that the defendant --
THE COURT: The objection is sustained.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So this file could have come from any computer in which the creation date that existed was December 27, 2012, correct?
MARK SPENCER: No, that's not correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So there's something on this file that tells you that it had to have come from the Samsung?
MARK SPENCER: This file, completeinspire.pdf, on the Laurel external hard drive --
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Yes.
MARK SPENCER: -- the owner SID relates specifically to the Samsung computer and the Umar account on that computer.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Which means that at some time that file, the origination of that file, was on the Samsung computer, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And then however -- wherever that files goes, that SID follows it?
MARK SPENCER: No.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So if it goes then to the Norfolk computer, then the Norfolk computer SID would be imparted into it?
MARK SPENCER: On the Norfolk computer.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: On the Norfolk computer.
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So you did recognize -- you do recognize that the Norfolk computer did access on an external drive around the same time the Complete Inspire magazine?
MARK SPENCER: A time other than January 21st?
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: On December 23rd and December 26th of 2012.
MARK SPENCER: We have a -- that could be correct. We have a spreadsheet which tracks the attachments of this device.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: You were here for Agent Swindon's testimony, right?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: You were seated here at counsel table. You saw some of the charts that showed that that file was accessed on an external drive on the Norfolk Street computer. You have no reason to question that, right?
MARK SPENCER: No.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Now, going back to -- I guess staying on this, there were some other files on this external hard drive that included appeared to be some movies. One of them was a Django Unchained, right?
MARK SPENCER: Are you --
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: I'm sorry. I'm looking -- I'll move it up here a little bit. Entry 74 and 75 and 76 appear to be records of the movie Django Unchained. It appears from -- in a folder called -- that ends with -- not in a folder, excuse me -- that has a text file that goes along with it called "torrent downloaded from extratorrent.com," correct?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Is that all an indication that these are movies that were downloaded through peer-to-peer network, some kind of torrent program?
MARK SPENCER: That's what it looks like, yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Somebody downloaded those files onto this external hard drive, right?
MARK SPENCER: The word "downloaded" infers that it came directly from the internet. But the files were created in a vacuum from this spreadsheet. We know that the files were created on the drive at that time.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So they were created on the drive. They weren't created on the 1W3?
MARK SPENCER: We're looking at the spreadsheet related to Laurel 1W16. These files were created on Laurel 1W16.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Okay. So these were created -- I'm not following what you mean in terms of whether a file was created on 1W16 or transferred to 1W16 from another device. I thought you just said that the Inspire magazines were transferred from Tamerlan's computer.
MARK SPENCER: I'll clarify. The device was plugged into the Samsung. That's how the owner information is populated.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: But you don't know then whether it was downloaded from the internet or downloaded from Tamerlan's computer?
MARK SPENCER: I'm confused. It would come from -- the drive would be connected to Tamerlan's computer either way.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: I understand that the drive was connected to the computer. The drive was connected to Tamerlan's computer and to the defendant's computer. I'm trying to figure out how these files got onto this computer, onto this hard drive. I'm simply asking you that -- there's a creation date for Django Unchained on March 18th. It's fair to say that those were downloaded from some source, either the internet or some computer, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Right. It came from somewhere via the computer that it was attached to.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And that's the same date as these Anwar Awlaki lectures, right?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And so you can't say with any more specificity where any of that stuff was downloaded from? All you can say is that that's the date that they were created on this hard drive?
MARK SPENCER: From this spreadsheet, that's correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And then the use of that hard drive later was all on April 6th or on April 19th -- or March 19th, correct?
MARK SPENCER: You can infer some type of use.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: But since this hard drive was not plugged into Tamerlan's computer after March 18, 2013, it's a fair inference that any access that postdates April -- March 18 of 2013 was done on the defendant's computer?
THE COURT: You may answer it.
MARK SPENCER: It's a -- you're asking me if it's a fair inference to say that any activity post a certain date was related to the defendant's computer?
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: You showed us 3302-04, which shows the dates that this device was plugged into the various computers, the two computers particularly. It does not include the Norfolk drive. It just includes the Sony laptop and the Samsung laptop, right?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And so these are the dates that those files -- that that device was accessed on -- after March 18th, correct?
MARK SPENCER: This chart shows you when this device, the Laurel Street hard drive, was connected to different computers that we have, that we have access to, forensic images.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So on April 6, March 21, and March 19 of 2013, this device was only plugged into the defendant's laptop?
MARK SPENCER: As it relates to the forensic images that we have access to. This information comes --
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Let me ask you a question.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: I think he had answered my question.
THE COURT: I think he had answered it.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So these accesses -- this was the simple question that I was trying to get to you. These accesses correlate to the accesses on the defendant's Sony laptop, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Similar time frame. This is not normally how forensic examiners will determine document or file activity.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Right. But those are the dates that this file was manipulated on this hard drive?
MARK SPENCER: That's correct, some type of interaction, yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And, in fact, there is a link file -- you're aware of what a link file is?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And you heard Agent Swindon talk about link files?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And they show that some user uses an application to actually access a file?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: In fact, the Django Unchained video was watched on the defendant's computer on March 19, 2013, as well as on another date, a couple days later?
MARK SPENCER: Yes. That's normally how we would look at file access.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And that file was not accessed on Tamerlan's computer, the Samsung? There was no such link file, right?
MARK SPENCER: Not that I know of.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Now, let's just get quickly to the idea of Tamerlan's computer, the 1W3. Now, you said that you don't know whether -- you can't make conclusions about what somebody is thinking or who the person is that's actually accessing a particular file, correct?
MARK SPENCER: We can't say with specificity who is at that keyboard.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So no matter what computer files are on somebody's computer, you can't say, Oh, this person must have been thinking something, right? That's beyond what a computer forensic scientist can do?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: So the 1W3, what you say is Tamerlan's computer, in fact, other people used that computer as well, right?
MARK SPENCER: My understanding is that that is correct, yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: In fact, the defendant used Tamerlan's computer, correct?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: In fact, he logged onto his email on Tamerlan's computer?
MARK SPENCER: I believe we know of one instance if you have the internet history.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: All right. And I think right around the time that this -- several of these files -- I think you described January 21, 2013, being the date that the external hard drive was set up on Tamerlan's computer, is that right? Let's go back to your chart. January 21, 2013, is the date that --
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: -- the hard drive was set up? This is the hard drive that had the homework assignments on it. It was cleaned, and the new jihadi material was put on it, right?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And so a few days before that, during Christmas break of 2013, the defendant was checking his email on Tamerlan's computer, is that right?
THE COURT: Overruled.
MARK SPENCER: I don't know the exact date and time. If you can pull it up, I will.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Okay. The exact date and time, I think, is less important than the fact that the defendant was actually using the defendant's -- Tamerlan's computer.
THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer it.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: The defendant was actually using Tamerlan's computer near the time that this hard drive was set up?
THE COURT: Overruled.
MARK SPENCER: We don't know that with the same certainty that we discussed before, who's sitting in that chair, but that would be consistent with another user.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: You don't know who made the decision to download these files or where they got these files from, right?
MARK SPENCER: Which files?
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Let's start with the Complete Inspire magazine. You don't know -- all you know is that that first appears on the Tsarnaev brothers echo system on January 21, 2012?
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Excuse me, 2011.
THE COURT: Overruled.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: December of 2011.
MARK SPENCER: Correct, on the removable storage device.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: And that means that it could have been plugged into another computer that nobody has ever found, right?
MARK SPENCER: That's correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: In fact, do you know that the defendant purchased a computer that nobody ever found?
THE COURT: Sustained.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: I think that's all, your Honor.
MR. FICK: If I may have one moment briefly?
Can we actually take the break, your Honor? I may have a little bit or I might not, but I'd -- I think we're almost at 11:00.
THE COURT: All right. We'll take the morning recess.
(Recess taken at 10:51 a.m.)
(The Court and jury entered the courtroom at 11:24 a.m.)
THE COURT: Okay.
REDIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. FICK:
MARK SPENCER: Good morning.
MR. FICK: Mr. Chakravarty took you through a couple of entries from Exhibit 3303-02, not in evidence but published them. That's the search history from the Sony computer. Do you remember him doing that with you?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MR. FICK: Your Honor, if I could do the same, just to publish without putting in evidence, the same sections that Mr. Chakravarty talked about with the Court's permission?
THE COURT: What is it you wanted?
MR. FICK: I just want the screen. I want to put up the same sections of this exhibit that are not moved into evidence but that Mr. Chakravarty talked about in the jury's presence.
THE COURT: You have them?
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: No objection.
MR. FICK: So, Mr. Spencer, do you remember Mr. Chakravarty showing you some of these? These are like entries from the Sony search entries?
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MARK SPENCER: Web history remnants or artifacts may not have dates, one, because they were never stored in the first place, by design, depending on the browser and the particular action in question or the date and time may no longer be available.
MR. FICK: While this information is captured by a search history tool, does it actually mean that somebody sat at a keyboard and typed all that in as their search?
MARK SPENCER: No, that's not necessarily what that means.
MR. FICK: So is it fair to say that some of these tools will gather as search history some information that's not actually a search? That's just that the tool happens to gather it that way?
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Objection, your Honor.
THE COURT: Overruled. You may have it.
MARK SPENCER: That's correct. The tools aren't perfect in terms of extracting out what they feel represent search criteria.
MR. FICK: Now, if I could now put on the screen -- actually, I'll just -- Exhibit 3303-006, which is the Samsung search history, I would just request the Court's permission to publish a small portion of it in the same manner if that's okay.
THE COURT: Okay.
MARK SPENCER: Yes.
MARK SPENCER: This is a list of the web searches for the Samsung laptop.
MR. FICK: And just the top one here, I mean, does this actually reflect the typing in of a search in Google with that term?
MARK SPENCER: Yes. Well, you can plainly see the search question mark Q equals, which is related to a Google search.
MR. FICK: What does that tell you about whoever was at the keyboard of the Samsung actually typed in?
MARK SPENCER: They're searching for this phrase.
MR. FICK: And I'm going to page through now. Is it fair to say that there are multiple pages -- on the Samsung, multiple pages of such searches over the course of several days and times?
MARK SPENCER: There's multiple terms that are used that are similar.
MR. FICK: If I may have one moment, your Honor?
I would just offer into evidence those 13 pages of Exhibit 3303-06 as 3303-6 -- I think we're at E or F.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Object to that, your Honor. This is beyond the scope of what -- certainly what the cross was. I didn't refer to this history.
THE COURT: Overruled. You may admit it.
COURT CLERK: I believe the next one should be E.
(Defendant's Exhibit No. 3303-06E received into evidence.)
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Just on that point.
RECROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. CHAKRAVARTY:
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Mr. Spencer, the exhibit that Mr. Fick just showed you, there were several searches on April 15 and April 16, 2013, correct, for the Boston Marathon explosion?
MARK SPENCER: That spreadsheet is related to the output from the tools, would show that's their web search output, web-search-related output.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: On those two dates, April 15 and April 16, the day of the Marathon and the day after?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: Those are dates where you don't know who the actual searcher was for that information?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: If the defendant and Tamerlan were together, you wouldn't be able to tell which one of them made those searches?
MARK SPENCER: Correct.
MR. CHAKRAVARTY: That's all I have.
THE COURT: All right, sir. You may step down.
MR. WATKINS: The defense calls Elena Graff.
COURT CLERK: Ma'am, would you step up here, please, up to the box. Remain standing. Raise your right hand.