Skip to content
personpersonGeorge A. O'Toole Jr.George A. O'Toole Jr.United States district judge presiding over the Boston Marathon bombing prosecution.← All People
JudgeCourt

George A. O'Toole Jr.

United States district judge presiding over the Boston Marathon bombing prosecution.

15,885 lines·659 proceedings

About

Judge George A. O'Toole Jr. directed jury selection, evidentiary rulings, and jury instructions through the guilt and penalty phases. He screened prospective jurors for hardship, publicity-related opinions, and impartiality, while restricting outside discussions, research, and media exposure. He explained that capital sentencing would follow only a capital conviction, distinguished the proof standards for aggravation and mitigation, and emphasized that death was never mandatory. He limited expanded publicity and case-specific death-qualification questions and denied the defense's fourth venue request.

During the guilt phase, O'Toole generally excluded mitigation evidence while leaving relevant evidence of the brothers' interactions subject to admissibility review. He cautioned against punishment-focused testimony and required fewer similar Boylston Street photographs. He maintained a limitation on glove DNA concerning either brother without evidence linking its deposit to the relevant events. Over the government's objection, he granted a jury view of the boat, then instructed jurors that the inspection involved observations rather than testimony.

O'Toole charged the jury on offense elements, criminal-liability theories, reasonable doubt, and unanimity. His evidence-evaluation instructions included a caution about Stephen Silva's cooperation agreement, and he instructed jurors not to draw an adverse inference from Tsarnaev's decision not to testify. During deliberations, he clarified conspiracy scope and aiding-and-abetting liability. After the jury returned guilty verdicts, he announced the penalty phase and continued the jurors' restrictions on outside discussion and information.

In the penalty phase, O'Toole excluded the Waltham events and allowed general adolescent brain-development testimony while barring individualized testimony. He cautioned jurors about the reliability limits of FBI interview reports used in place of live witnesses. He permitted Sister Helen Prejean's lay opinion on remorse, but restricted its basis, defendant statements, and predictions of future change.

O'Toole's final sentencing instructions addressed capital eligibility, aggravating and mitigating factors, and individual sentencing discretion. He required unanimity for death, protected each juror's judgment, and clarified that gateway findings had to rest on Tsarnaev's personal actions and intent. After the jury unanimously selected death on six capital counts, he imposed death sentences on those counts, additional prison terms, and restitution, forfeiture, and assessment orders.

Trial Record (659)

2015 Trial2015 Federal TrialJan 5, 2015 – Jun 24, 2015

Judge George A. O'Toole Jr. directed the trial's jury selection, evidence rulings, and instructions, distinguishing guilt evidence from capital-sentencing evidence and requiring individualized, unanimous agreement for death. After the jury selected death on six capital counts, he imposed death sentences on those counts and additional prison terms.

Day 1

Day 2

Day 3

Day 4

Day 5

Day 6

Day 7

Day 8

Day 9

Day 10

Day 11

Jury InstructionPreliminary Instructions on Capital Trial and Jury Selection1highlight5lines spoken

Summary

Judge O'Toole outlines conditional capital sentencing, proof requirements, and juror discretion, then explains individual questioning and restrictions on outside influence.

Highlights (1)

Quote“You should understand that a jury is never required to find that a sentence of death is justified.”— George A. O'Toole Jr.Emphasizes that finding aggravating factors does not make a death sentence mandatory.Open in transcript →
Voir DireIndividual Voir Dire Resumed87lines spoken

Summary

Two prospective jurors faced questions about hardship, publicity, and sentencing views. The court limited several defense follow-ups concerning a child's death, venue opinions, death-penalty ratings, and law-enforcement credibility.

Day 12

Day 13

Day 14

Day 15

Day 16

Day 17

Day 18

Day 19

Day 20

Day 23

Day 25

Day 26

Day 27

Day 28

Day 29

Day 30

Day 31

Day 32

Day 33

Day 34

Day 35

Day 36

Day 37

Day 38

Day 39

Day 40

Day 41

Day 42

Day 43

Day 44

Day 45

Day 46

Day 47

Day 48

Day 49

Day 50

Day 51

Day 52

Day 53

Day 54

Day 55

Day 56

Day 57

Day 58

Day 59

Day 60

Day 61

ProceduralRulings on Sister Helen Prejean's Remorse Testimony1highlight64lines spoken

Summary

The Court allowed Sister Helen Prejean's lay opinion on remorse but restricted its basis, defendant statements, and predictions of future change.

Highlights (1)

Quote“So she may testify to her lay opinion based on her observations of him as it equates to perceptions in Rule 701 but not with reference to experience with other death row inmates.”— George A. O'Toole Jr.States the central limit separating the permitted remorse opinion from experience-based expertise.Open in transcript →

Day 62

Charge ConferenceCharge Conference on Jury Deadlock and Unanimity1highlight9lines spoken

Summary

The judge rejected a deadlock-consequences instruction and barred related defense argument; Bruck preserved a Sixth Amendment objection.

Highlights (1)

Quote“I think that the policy should encourage unanimity, encourage it to the extent it is possible conscientiously in each juror's sound judgment.”— George A. O'Toole Jr.Explains the judge's rationale for withholding an instruction on the consequences of nonunanimity.Open in transcript →

Day 63

sidebarObjections to Mellin’s Closing Argument9lines spoken

Summary

Defense counsel challenged Mellin’s closing over an alleged comment on the defendant’s failure to testify, death-penalty age requirements, ADX programming, treatment of the verdict form and mitigating factors, and reserving mitigation responses for reply.

Day 64

Day 65

Day 66

Day 67

ProceduralVictim Impact Statements7lines spoken

Summary

Survivors and families described loss, lasting injuries, caregiving burdens, and financial harm, while expressing differing views on punishment, remorse, forgiveness, and recovery.