Day 27 - March 4, 2015
Guilt-phase rulings and jury instructions preceded competing opening statements about the brothers' roles. Marathon organizers, a store manager, and injured spectators then testified about the blasts, emergency aid, and injuries, with photographs and videos presented to the jury.
Full day summary
5. Opening Statement — Prosecution
William D. Weinreb opened the prosecution’s case, outlining allegations against Jahar Tsarnaev and previewing the evidence the government planned to present.
Highlights
Opening Statement - ProsecutionotherWeinreb previewed DNA and ballistics evidence and argued that the brothers' differing roles did not defeat the government's theory of joint responsibility.Opening Statement - Prosecution“In the end, it doesn't matter what role each of them played, so long as you find that they were partners and carried out these crimes together.”— William D. WeinrebExpresses the central joint-participation theory Weinreb asked the jury to apply.
6. Opening Statement — Defense
Judy Clarke acknowledged Jahar’s responsibility while arguing that Tamerlan led the attacks. The court limited discussion of influence and family history during the defense opening.
Highlights
Opening Statement - DefenseadmissionClarke acknowledged that the defense disputed little of the alleged bombings, Officer Collier's killing, carjacking, and Watertown shootout, including Jahar's identification in the anticipated video.Opening Statement - Defense“The evidence will not establish, and we will not argue, that Tamerlan put a gun to Jahar's head or that he forced him to join in the plan, but you will hear evidence of the kind of influence that this older brother had.”— Judy ClarkeClarke expressly distinguished the defense's influence argument from a claim of forced participation.