Skip to content
2015 Federal TrialtranscripttranscriptFinal Sentencing Instructions — Unanimity and Individual Judgment - Day 63 - 2015 Federal TrialJudge O'Toole concludes the sentencing instructions, emphasizing unanimity for a death sentence and each juror's independent judgment.
David I. BruckMiriam ConradGeorge A. O'Toole Jr.THE COURTMR. BRUCKMS. CONRADCourt Clerkjury_instructionssidebarprocedural
10 pages·0 witnesses·390 lines
Jurors received sentencing instructions and heard competing requests for death and life without release. The court denied a defense mistrial motion and later rejected requests for a reply and a curative instruction concerning Sister Helen Prejean's testimony. Sentencing deliberations began briefly before the jury was released for the evening.
← Day 62Day 64 →
Final Sentencing Instructions - Unanimity and Individual Judgment
Jury InstructionJury Instr.Final Sentencing Instructions - Unanimity and Individual Judgment

(In open court:)

THE COURT: Jurors, I'm going to just complete my instructions with a few relatively brief remarks.

I've outlined for you the rules of law applicable to your consideration of the death penalty and the process by which you should determine the facts and weigh the evidence. And in a few moments, you'll retire to the jury room.

The importance of your deliberations should be obvious. I remind you that you can return a decision sentencing Mr. Tsarnaev to death only if all 12 of you are unanimously persuaded that the death penalty is, in fact, appropriate. And, again, I remind you that no juror is ever required by law to impose a death sentence.

When you're in the jury room, please discuss all aspects of these sentencing issues among yourselves with candor and frankness, but also with a due regard and respect for the opinions of one another. This has been a long case, and you have spent a lot of time together as jurors. Regardless of any personal regard you may have for each other, you must each decide this case for yourself. No juror should surrender his or her own conscientious conclusion merely because other jurors might feel otherwise or simply to get to a unanimous decision.

Remember that the parties and the Court are relying on you to give full, considered and mature consideration to the question of sentencing. By so doing, you carry out, to the fullest, your oath as jurors, that you will well and truly try the issues of this case and render a just verdict.

As with the prior phase, if it becomes necessary during your deliberations to communicate with me for any reason, simply send a note signed by the foreman of the jury. If you send a note, do not indicate any decision-making on any of the issues that are before you or provide any details about your progress. And additionally, do not attempt to communicate with the Court or any other court personnel, except the court security officer by telling him that you have the need for him to convey it, other than in writing, a signed writing. There will be no oral communications. Any questions you have, you should present in writing.

When you have reached a decision, send me a note signed by the foreman that you have reached a decision. Do not indicate on the note what the decision is. And in no communication with the Court prior to a verdict should you ever give a numerical count of where the jury stands in its deliberations on any issue.

Whichever decision you reach, the foreman must also sign and fill out the verdict form accordingly, according to the verdict, and be prepared to report to the Court your findings as to the issues in the verdict form, the defendant's age, the gateway, aggravating and mitigating factors and your sentencing decision.

As we did in the prior phase, you will have an envelope in the room that at the end of the day, each day, as you deliberate, you will put the verdict slip inside the envelope and seal it, and it will remain sealed and be returned to you in a sealed condition the following day and you will remove it from the envelope yourselves.

I note for the record that you will not have your cellular phones, PDAs or other electronic devices during the deliberations. I understand they have already been collected from you and will not be returned to you until the court recesses each day.

Of course, as I previously said, it would be improper and a violation of your oath as a juror to conduct any outside research or investigation on the Internet or otherwise to -- or otherwise, or to communicate with anyone, including your fellow jurors, outside the deliberations conducted by the jury as a whole in the jury room.

As in the first phase, only 12 jurors will be deliberate. The alternates remain important because you may be called to serve in the event that a deliberating juror is no longer able to participate in the deliberations. But as before, the alternate jurors will be separated from the deliberating jurors during the deliberations.

And among the alternate jurors, you're not to discuss anything about the case or the penalty among each other. In other words, you're not to act as if you were also a deliberating jury.

When the court is in session, you will return to the courtroom as well so that you may hear any responses to jury questions and any other remarks that are necessary from me. Let me conclude by reminding you again that nothing I have said in my instructions and nothing I've done or said during the course of the trial has been said or done to suggest to you what I think the outcome should be. What the sentencing decision should be is your exclusive duty and responsibility.

Let me see counsel again at the side, please.

sidebarsidebarPreserving the Deadlock Instruction Objection

(Discussion at sidebar and out of the hearing of the jury:)

MR. BRUCK: Well, the first objection we'd like to make is the Court's refusal of our Instruction No. 3, which is the instruction that -- concerning the consequences of a deadlock.

THE COURT: Okay. All right.

MR. BRUCK: And I understand that the rule may require me to spell that out unless --

THE COURT: I don't think so.

MS. CONRAD: The First Circuit does. You can't just refer to it by the number. You actually have to state what was requested and what's not --

MR. BRUCK: No, that's not the one.

THE COURT: I think that's stating a summary.

MR. BRUCK: Maybe I should read it to be sure.

MS. CONRAD: The First Circuit says -- it's very short. The First Circuit says you have to read it.

MR. BRUCK: The request --

THE COURT: Well, I'm concerned about the jury hearing it.

MS. CONRAD: Well, your Honor, I'm telling you the First -- that our appeals chief is in the courtroom. If you want to bring her up to sidebar, she'll tell you. She'll be all over me if we don't read it.

THE COURT: Well, I'll tell you what, we can excuse the jury without commissioning them to begin deliberating.

MR. BRUCK: That would be great.

ProceduralProc.Jury Excused Before Deliberations for Instruction Objections

(In open court:)

THE COURT: Jurors, we have to do this outside your hearing, and because the music is dipping on us, we are afraid that you might be able to hear it. So we're going to actually ask you to step out of the room, not to begin deliberating. We're going to have you back in before you do that. But just step out so that we can have a conversation, frankly, without having to worry about whether you're hearing things you shouldn't hear.

COURT CLERK: All rise for the jury.

(The jury exits the courtroom at 3:56 p.m.)

Continue to next page9.Sentencing Instruction Objections — Prior Rulings Maintained