Skip to content
2015 Federal Trialtrial-daytrial-dayAloke ChakravartySteven D. MellinNadine PellegriniWilliam D. WeinrebDavid I. BruckJudy ClarkeTimothy G. WatkinsDavid CahillMiguel ColonChristopher DonahueTimothy E. DowdKimberly FranksMatthew RiportellaColleen M. TanguayMatthew LevittJennifer MontgomeryMark PrebledirectcrossredirectDay 38 - March 24, 2015Levitt completed testimony on extremist literature and the limits of his analysis. Witnesses described Watertown ballistics, fingerprints, scene mapping and the SUV's departure, followed by university and dorm-room evidence. The court restricted inquiry into Officer Donohue's injury and required facial masking for some autopsy photographs.
← Day 372015 Federal TrialDay 39 →

Day 38 - March 24, 2015

Levitt Testimony, Watertown Evidence, and Autopsy Photograph Rulings

Judge George A. O'Toole Jr.
28Proceedings
11Pages
10Witnesses
3,055Lines
5Sidebars
Day 38 of 67
Appearing:

Levitt completed testimony on extremist literature and the limits of his analysis. Witnesses described Watertown ballistics, fingerprints, scene mapping and the SUV's departure, followed by university and dorm-room evidence. The court restricted inquiry into Officer Donohue's injury and required facial masking for some autopsy photographs.

Full day summary

Matthew Levitt completed testimony comparing the defendant's boat writing with extremist literature. He distinguished Islamic teaching from the movement's treatment of civilians and described reprisal themes. On cross-examination, he said he could not independently verify the supplied files' provenance, had received no material from Tamerlan Tsarnaev's computer, and had not been asked to identify who radicalized the defendant. He maintained that the writing paralleled the supplied material while acknowledging other possible influences. On redirect, he said exposure to radical ideas does not necessarily lead to violence. Colleen Tanguay described documenting the Laurel Street scene after the suspect search and clearance of explosive hazards delayed access. Photographs showed the Ruger, ammunition, bomb pieces and damage to homes and vehicles. Firearms examiner David Cahill attributed all 56 recovered Watertown 9 mm casings and five MIT-related projectiles to the recovered Ruger P95. He attributed approximately 210 other casings to police weapons, clarifying that 16 rifle casings came from a separate incident four blocks away. He could not match 32 projectiles recovered from the Mercedes SUV to police weapons. On redirect, he identified a projectile recovered inside a police car as having been fired by the recovered gun. Timothy Dowd explained the limits of his scene diagrams, including illustrative vehicle placement and his reliance on evidence placards identified by Tanguay. During a sidebar about Officer Dic Donohue's injury, prosecutors said they could not identify the shooter and would not argue that either brother shot him. The court rejected the proposed inquiry as speculative and irrelevant. Later, it declined to recall Dowd or strike disputed house bullet-hole testimony; the parties disagreed over whether that testimony established a Ruger identification. Christopher Donahue identified Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's fingerprints on the ammunition box and pellet-gun trigger, and Tamerlan's prints on the Ruger magazine and live rounds. Cross-examination established that Dzhokhar's prints were not identified on the magazine or live rounds. Donahue could not date the prints and cautioned that an absent print did not establish that someone had never touched an object. Jennifer Montgomery testified that stains on a Honda Civic key card matched Sean Collier's DNA profile. Miguel Colon identified the defendant as the SUV driver and described the vehicle striking and dragging a person on the ground. On cross-examination, he said he could not determine how many people were shooting. Other testimony covered firing-range records, university records and the dorm-room search. Matthew Riportella qualified his reading of a rented handgun model and said his interpretation of ammunition marks came from information supplied to him. Mark Preble distinguished recorded card swipes from door openings. Kimberly Franks authenticated dorm-room evidence admitted over preserved defense objections; her examination remained unfinished at recess. The court authorized confidential defense access to Tazhayakov's presentence report. It also allowed some autopsy photographs with victims' faces masked, reserved review of a close-up wound photograph, and deferred a decision on private press viewing. Counsel discussed defense witnesses and advance review of jury instructions.

1. Matthew Levitt — Direct/Cross/Redirect (Part 3)

Matthew Levitt completed his testimony on Day 38, comparing the boat writing with extremist literature. Cross-examination challenged his expertise and source materials; on redirect, he clarified that exposure to Awlaki’s material does not necessarily lead to violence.

→
Procedural
Morning Session Opening
9 lines
Direct
Matthew Levitt — Direct (continued) Matthew Levitt Aloke Chakravarty
55 lines

Levitt compared boat writing with extremist literature; the court agreed with a defense objection to his interpretation of a plain-English phrase.

Cross
Matthew Levitt — Cross-Examination Matthew Levitt David I. Bruck
263 lines

Bruck tested Levitt's limited review, competing sources of radicalization, religious interpretations, compensation, and retweets of testimony coverage.

Redirect
Matthew Levitt — Redirect Examination Matthew Levitt Aloke Chakravarty
29 lines

Levitt distinguished radical ideas from violent action, addressed his retweets, and confirmed the April 2012 date of an Awlaki-related tweet.

Highlights

3. David Cahill — Direct/Cross/Redirect

David Cahill linked MIT projectiles and Watertown casings to the recovered Ruger P95. Cross-examination addressed fingerprint testing, police gunfire, and limits on matching recovered projectiles.

→
sidebar
Trooper Cahill’s Qualifications and Testimony
9 lines

Watkins maintained his scientific-basis objection to Trooper Cahill’s testimony but asked the court to rely on the papers rather than conduct prolonged voir dire.

Procedural
Return to Open Court Before Cahill's Examination
1 lines
Direct
David Cahill — Direct Examination David Cahill Steven D. Mellin
601 lines

Cahill identified five MIT-related projectiles and 56 Watertown casings to the recovered Ruger, distinguishing the casings fired by police weapons.

Cross
David Cahill — Cross-Examination David Cahill Timothy G. Watkins
156 lines

Cahill described police gunfire and forensic limits; the court barred a speculative inference about a shot missing the fleeing Mercedes.

Redirect
David Cahill — Redirect Examination David Cahill Steven D. Mellin
25 lines

Cahill explained why casings can go unrecovered and confirmed a cruiser projectile's match to the recovered gun.

Highlights

5. Timothy E. Dowd — Direct/Cross

Timothy E. Dowd explained his Laurel Street evidence mapping and acknowledged vehicle-placement inaccuracies. The court excluded a proposed inquiry into who shot Dic Donohue as speculative and irrelevant.

→
Direct
Timothy E. Dowd — Direct Examination Timothy E. Dowd William D. Weinreb
218 lines

Dowd explained Laurel Street evidence mapping, authenticated four admitted exhibits, and acknowledged limits in the diagram's vehicle placement.

Cross
Timothy E. Dowd — Cross-Examination Timothy E. Dowd Timothy G. Watkins
151 lines

Dowd acknowledged scene-map limitations; the court restricted Donohue-injury questioning but allowed two locations to be marked on an aerial photograph.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Limits on Questioning About Donohue’s InjuryThe defense sought driveway-location evidence to rule out Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s gun as the source of Dic Donohue’s injury, while prosecutors challenged the questioning’s scope and foundation.

Highlights

9. Mark Preble — Direct

Mark Preble authenticated Jahar Tsarnaev’s UMass Dartmouth student records and discussed dormitory card swipes, a financial-aid appeal, and academic and housing records. The defense asked no questions.

→
sidebar
Admissibility of Handwritten Academic Statements
24 lines

The defense challenged two handwritten academic statements as irrelevant and prejudicial, while the government argued they were relevant as handwriting exemplars and evidence of state of mind.

Procedural
Return to Open Court Before Preble's Examination
2 lines
Direct
Mark Preble — Direct Examination Mark Preble Aloke Chakravarty
151 lines

Preble authenticated university records and explained Pine Dale card swipes, Tsarnaev's financial-aid appeal, academic transcript and housing assignment.

11. Tazhayakov PSR Disclosure, Autopsy-Photograph Masking and Press Access, and Denied Dowd Recall and Bullet-Hole Requests

The court authorized confidential disclosure of Tazhayakov’s presentence report, required facial masking in permitted autopsy photographs, and deferred the press-access question. It also denied renewed defense requests to recall Trooper Dowd and strike house bullet-hole testimony.

→
Procedural
Tazhayakov PSR — Confidential Disclosure Authorized
26 lines

The court authorized confidential disclosure of Tazhayakov's PSR and left the defense's immigration-information request to counsel.

Procedural
Autopsy Photographs — Facial Masking and Press-Access Objection
61 lines

The court required facial masking in autopsy photographs, deferred a press-access decision, and discussed defense-case timing and jury-instruction review.

Procedural
Renewed Requests to Recall Dowd and Strike Bullet-Hole Testimony Denied
14 lines

The court rejected requests to recall Dowd and strike bullet-hole testimony, then confirmed the Patriots' Day trial schedule.

Highlights

← Day 372015 Federal TrialDay 39 →